Skip to main content

My Money!

           I know its been a while since I've posted another entry, but I have a legitimate excuse this time! It's college time baby! Move in, classes, orgs, all that good stuff really fills up the time! But of course with all the good, it is still college. And with that, I've found yet another thing that makes me both angry and annoyed.
          Now obviously one has to go ahead and find textbooks for their classes when required. For the most part required textbooks have cheaper options, whether it be a rental, used, or even a free online pdf. Yes the pricing of text books can be annoying, but at least it's understandable! Teachers have to provide the knowledge from somewhere, and textbooks are perfect. They contain all the general knowledge needed for the course and often have examples of course topics and even practice problems that assist you on exams. And in the end, teachers often need them to provide a point of reference that is needed badly by students, especially ones new to college or even the topic at hand.
        Something that I can't understand, something whose need is just unfathomable to me however is the need for students to purchase online subscriptions to homework databases. Let me make this a little but clearer before I continue. In many classes, usually math ones, teachers will require students to purchase a subscription for an online service where kids complete and submit assignments for the class. This usually happens in large classes where a teacher is never going to take or really have the time to individually grade each student's assignment, and instead simply views their scores and work through the service. But why? There is absolutely no point. First off, its often expensive. As of right now I have had to sign up for three of these services, and two were $120 each! That's more expensive than the textbook.
          When you think about it, there is no need for these services. Teachers could just assign problems and trust students to do it. Whether they do it or not is up to them and will more likely than not be reflected in their exam grades. For this online homework, completing it doesn't mean a student completed it. Many students cheat on these assignments by using the internet or/and their friends. You could argue this is the student's fault for cheating and not using the service properly. Sure. You could. But you could also blame the teacher for forcing students to shell out more money than is already being paid to the school rather than teaching properly in class and using the exams to grade students.
          As always, keep in mind that this is my angry and annoyed opinion. I am sure teachers have convinced themselves there are good reasons for requiring these purchases, and I would love to hear them! But until then, I am going to continue believing I wasted money.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Spiderman 4: Into the Metaverse

 At first, I thought I was going to write about Facebook doing a complete rebrand as a company and their transformation into "Meta". On Oct 28th, CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced that the company Facebook was more than just the platform Facebook and that the company name no longer encapsulated everything the company was trying to do. And just as  Google in 2015 had a restructure into parent company Alphabet, Facebook (the company) is now Meta. But as I did more research on what that entailed, I realized it's not really Facebook (from here on out Meta by the way) that I care about. Meta is just one small piece of this mess. Because, and call me cynical, I am one of the many who believe that Mark is just trying to move past all of the large pitfalls his company has recently encountered. I mean everything from large Instagram and Facebook outages to the recent whistleblower and the "Facebook Papers" cannot be good for the company name. I mean since really the beginnin...

The NFTea on NFT Video Games

 For the sake of clarity, I will do the briefest of recaps on what an NFT is before delving into my main business for today. An NFT, or "Non-fungible token" can be thought of as a purchasable digital proof of authenticity linked to a digital work. When an NFT is minted and sold on a marketplace, it can be bought and the buyer will receive the work and the digital code to mark their ownership. The word "receive" is not literal, as there is no physical work mailed to them. This is where most people get tripped up. Yes the work is digital and anyone can simply hit right-click and download the art. But then again, I don't have to pay millions at auction to own the Mona Lisa, I can order a cheap print of Amazon. Think of the NFT as being the mark that the buyer has rights to the authentic original. Yes, there are plenty of arguments against NFTs, from their use to their adverse effects on the environment. But, I am in no mood to get to them now and lucky for me this ...

Stoner Cats: The Cash Grab We All Should Have Expected

Yeah I'm talking about NFTs and crypto again. What of it? It annoys me. Although it is partially on me, since most of research now a days is crypto related so are a lot of my advertisements and suggested content. Anyway, onto the title of this blog. I suppose that, like a lot of these NFT "projects" we should go back to the beginning. This one is a doozy. Stoner Cats is an animated series revolving around six cats and their owner. Oh, and the cats are high on marijuana. That's it, that is the show. The project is consisted of multiple episodes (three as of the time I am writing) and claims it will go on for multiple seasons. On the Stoner Cats website , they say that the project was conceived sometime before 2020 and was later picked up by Orchard Farm Productions. The actual production of each episode is being done by Ghostbot Studios. They are a San Francisco based animation house that has worked on high profile projects in the past such as "Lost Treasure Hunt...